Jermaine Jenas Is not The Solely One: ‘I Was Additionally A Sufferer of Inappropriate Texts From a Senior BBC Colleague’

Jermaine Jenas has publicly apologised to 2 ladies after the BBC fired him for allegedly sending inappropriate messages. The pundit maintains that the communications had been “consensual” however is “deeply sorry” for his actions.

Right here, Sally Meeson displays on her personal expertise of unsolicited texting from a senior BBC colleague – and why it is time we took this type of harassment extra critically.

I bear in mind the dialog clearly. I used to be sat with my colleagues at a neighborhood BBC radio station as a junior producer in my early twenties. I would requested what they thought I ought to do a few man who’d been bothering me on the health club, following me from health machine to health machine, from the pool to the jacuzzi to the sauna. Putting up unsolicited conversations, asking me out and making me really feel extraordinarily uncomfortable. My married senior colleague, who sat subsequent to me, was the primary to react:

“Report him to administration instantly!” he bellowed.

“That’s outrageous behaviour. He shouldn’t be allowed to get away with it. You must get him banned from the health club.”

Seconds later, the personal messaging bar on the high of my pc display screen began flashing. It appeared that my boss had one thing to quietly add to his earlier loud and really public assertion:

“However I can’t say that I blame him.”

It wasn’t simply the content material of that message which disturbed me. It was its surreptitious nature and the blatant hypocrisy. My boss had actually simply preached to the whole room in regards to the abhorrence of males who harass ladies with undesirable consideration, whereas secretly finishing up the very same motion. I used to be shocked and disgusted. However since this man was much more senior than me and I didn’t wish to trigger a scene, I stated nothing.

This is able to be the start of many such inappropriate messages my married boss would silently ship to me through the key medium of a “top-line message”. A gentle drip, drip of sly innuendos, undesirable compliments and idle flirtation. Till someday he forgot himself and blurted one thing in public about why I acquired my job. He then appeared at work the next day pale-faced as if he hadn’t slept, quietly took me to a board room and stated: “Sorry”.

That singular phrase appears to get used so much by married males, like sacked BBC TV presenter and former footballer Jermaine Jenas, after they get came upon. But whereas they’re caught within the thrill of a cloak-and-dagger affair, carried out completely digitally, convincing themselves they’re not actually dishonest, they not often appear sorry in any respect.

Regardless of my outdated boss’ apology, not lengthy after I moved from native BBC radio to nationwide TV in London, he began messaging me once more; badgering me to fulfill him for espresso whereas he was within the capital, one thing we had by no means even performed after we had been colleagues. Clearly, I made my excuses and declined.

It’s been over 20 years since I acquired harassed through message by my outdated BBC boss. However with the mediums the place males can digitally contact ladies exploding, I’ve discovered myself the topic of those one-sided affairs carried out through their units numerous occasions since. And I’m certain a lot of the males concerned satisfied themselves that it was completely ‘consensual’.

Take the man I dated for a number of months earlier than we determined to only be mates. Our relationship remained (so far as I used to be conscious) wholesome and pleasant for a few yr. Till he returned to Australia and acquired into a brand new relationship. Then, late-night messages began showing through Fb messenger, telling me I used to be “the one who acquired away” and suggesting we share bare photos. Which, after all, I by no means did. Nevertheless it was disturbing that this man who I believed I knew, but had by no means seen this facet of, all of the sudden felt assured and justified harassing me with sleazy messages; now he was over 9,000 miles away and likewise seeing one other girl.

“Many males have switched their harassment from bodily to digital. Assuring themselves: ‘There’s no touching. I’m not dishonest. I’m nonetheless a pleasant man’”

There gave the impression to be a sea change in 2017 when ladies publicly referred to as males out on harassment in the course of the #MeToo motion. Round this time, many males I knew admitted it made them take a more in-depth take a look at their behaviour in the direction of ladies. However my very own expertise, plus that of Jenas and numerous different sexting victims, suggests this self-awareness was short-lived. Many males have merely switched their harassment from verbal and bodily to digital. Assuring themselves: “There’s no touching. I’m not dishonest. I’m nonetheless a pleasant man.”

Like the person I met 5 years after the #MeToo motion in 2022. He requested me out, then continued to ship flirty messages daily for six weeks earlier than we pinned down a date. However we solely made it to the second drink earlier than he admitted he was married. “It’s not like I’m breaking the legislation,” he stated coldly, after I vocalised my disgust at his therapy of his spouse, to not point out his waste of my time.

However I used to be as cross in regards to the weeks of messages (a cowardly pastime to flee from his marriage, which I believed could possibly be the beginning of a relationship) because the date itself. His tone-deaf response confirmed full disrespect to his spouse, harking back to Jermaine Jenas’ protest that sending suggestive texts wasn’t “unlawful”.

It’s time we name these texts cheats out and cease males from utilizing “sexting” as a loophole for inappropriate behaviour. We have to be sure that males who behave like Jermaine Jenas and my outdated BBC boss now not maintain the facility to secretly harass ladies within the office. Is that an excessive amount of to ask?