Democrats will spend the subsequent 4 years debating why the occasion suffered a sweeping defeat final week. Perhaps it was inflation, or the tradition wars, or Joe Biden’s hubris, or podcasts, that drove voters in each swing state to the Republican presidential nominee. At the very least one idea, nonetheless, can already be put to relaxation: Elon Musk didn’t “steal” the election for Donald Trump.
Within the weeks and months main as much as the election, Republican officers and operatives architected a second “Cease the Steal” marketing campaign, able to deploy ought to their presidential candidate lose. Musk laid a lot of this groundwork himself, as an example by aggressively selling the false narrative that the Democrats had introduced foreigners into america to vote illegally, amongst different falsehoods. But following Trump’s election, it was the left sowing doubts: “#donotconcedekamala” and “Trump cheated” each trended on X. One submit on Threads learn, “20 million Democratic votes don’t disappear on their very own,” and pointed to Musk, Peter Thiel, and Vladimir Putin as seemingly culprits. “If anybody may fund an enormous election fraud scheme it’s Elon musk. He additionally has motive,” Dean Obeidallah, a progressive radio host, posted to Threads and X on Friday. Such posts have been seen tens of thousands and thousands of occasions.
There may be no proof to assist these claims—however they’re nonetheless basically completely different from the unique “Cease the Steal” motion. Democratic management, for instance, just isn’t repeating these conspiracy theories, neither is there a coordinated try and amplify, validate, or act on them. (Obeidallah himself ultimately clarified his place, writing on his Substack yesterday that though skepticism is wholesome, “there’s at present no credible, goal proof of fraud or some other legal conduct” suggesting that the end result was illegitimate.) Actually, the 2024 election was by all accounts extraordinarily safe. There is no such thing as a proof that international interference affected the outcomes, nor did any home conspiracy materially harm election administration. “Our election infrastructure has by no means been safer,” Jen Easterly, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company, mentioned in a assertion on November 6. “We have now no proof of any malicious exercise that had a fabric influence on the safety or integrity of our election infrastructure.” High officers in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, all key battlegrounds, have mentioned the election was secure, free, and honest.
That hasn’t stopped some Democrats from implying in any other case. Musk, as considered one of Trump’s most vocal supporters and an especially on-line enemy of the extraordinarily on-line left, has develop into an apparent goal. Perhaps the world’s richest man hacked the election together with his Starlink satellite tv for pc community; perhaps Democratic ballots had been systematically not counted; even when the mechanism is unclear, the math isn’t mathing. Even when such suspicions are raised in good religion, they’re counterproductive. Musk—who’s now shut sufficient to Trump to have joined him on a latest name with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky—is harmful. His willingness to amplify brazen lies in an effort to assist advance the end result he needed was on show for months main as much as the election. However the misinformation about him or any main Republican determine stealing the election obscures and diminishes the precise menace at hand: The authoritarian bent in American media, enterprise, and politics that Musk represents has profoundly warped many Individuals’ political discourse, belief in each other, and grip on actuality, all without having to mess with any ballots.
Believing that Musk rigged this November’s end result has develop into, a minimum of for some, simpler than accepting the reality: Trump, an brazenly racist and misogynistic candidate who tried to overthrow the federal government and has mentioned he needs generals like these of the Third Reich, simply received the Electoral Faculty and is poised to assert the favored vote in america. But fantasies about election fraud are harmful this time round, not as a result of they’ll actively undermine or mount a bodily menace to democracy, however as a result of they blunt, and even willfully ignore, actuality. That is Trump’s occasion now, everybody is aware of it, pundits ought to know that everybody is aware of it, and the GOP nonetheless received again management of the Senate and can seemingly declare a slender majority within the Home of Representatives. As of Friday, Trump had improved his vote margin in additional than 9 out of each 10 counties with near-complete outcomes, together with many progressive strongholds. Fixating on fraud disregards the fabric components that introduced the nation and its residents to this selection, and detracts from the daunting work that should be achieved to recuperate.
And Elon Musk, “hacking” apart, performed a considerable position in Trump’s reelection marketing campaign by spreading and normalizing a variety of hateful rhetoric and conspiracy theories. He has been the spearhead of a rising section of the ultra-wealthy technocratic class that quickly coalesced round Trump this 12 months. The far-right rhetoric about voter fraud that Musk has amplified helped set off a wave of dying threats in opposition to election officers. He’s making an attempt to single-handedly substitute goal sources of knowledge and reporting together with his white-supremacist social community, degrading America’s info atmosphere to the purpose that it has develop into unclear how, precisely, to alter anybody’s thoughts about something.
It isn’t shocking that suspicion in regards to the election has cropped up. Conspiracy theories ceaselessly emerge round election time, and so they have for many years. These Democrats will not be being uniquely, and even particularly, whiny or hypocritical. Earlier than Trump decried a “steal” in 2020, Democrats blamed Russian trolls and Fb in 2016. (In that case, to be clear, U.S. intelligence officers did discover proof of Russian interference—however not proof that it was what decisively swung the end result in Trump’s favor.) 4 years prior, Trump known as Barack Obama’s victory a “complete sham,” and in 2008 John McCain’s marketing campaign was reportedly gathering studies of “Election Day irregularities” earlier than his overwhelming defeat. Each occasions, a ballot discovered that roughly half of Republicans thought the election was stolen. In 2004, some Democrats blamed shenanigans in Ohio for John Kerry’s exit-poll-defying loss, and in 2000 the perpetrator was then–Florida Governor Jeb Bush and the state’s notorious “hanging chads.”
But Trump’s political foes must be striving to show that cognitive flexibility, grounded in actuality, is feasible. Anybody who believes in democracy, registered Democrat or not, ought to settle for the outcomes—and, as a substitute of retroactively fixating on polling and knowledge, focus all their power on the financial, social, political, and different features of individuals’s lives that brought about this end result, and on the right way to make these individuals’s lives higher.
