A New “Pure” Filler… Made From Your Personal Blood?

Dr. Day is skeptical: “I have never seen nice printed knowledge on [the benefits of PRF for skin,],” she says. “I don’t [offer PRF] for the pores and skin, as a result of I have been following [its use] in Europe for many years and I have never seen a lot profit. I’ve seen individuals sad with the outcomes, and even individuals who have scarring from it. I actually discuss individuals out of it.”

And also you won’t need PRF for plumping up your nasal labial folds: “PRF is being offered as filler, however I do not assume it really works like filler,” says Dr. Day.

So why are extra individuals enthusiastic about PRF? There’s a newness issue, for positive. There’s a consolation issue (whether or not or not it’s warranted), in one thing that’s derived from your individual physique. After which there’s this: Extra “sufferers are in search of alternate options to filler,” says Ava Shamban, MD, a board-certified dermatologist in Beverly Hills and Santa Monica, who provides PRF therapies in her personal observe. We’re dwelling in a time of “filler fatigue”—fueled by sufferers who “expertise sagging, heaviness, or stretched-out tissues from overfilling and improper strategies [like poor] product placement,” says Dr. Shamban. However regardless of all of the discuss of filler fatigue, we’re additionally getting extra injectables—fillers have been up 4 p.c in 2023, as in comparison with 2022, in keeping with the American Society of Plastic Surgeons’ survey and development report. We need to look younger. However we don’t need to look crammed. That makes “a extra ‘pure’ product for pores and skin revitalization and rejuvenation” a tempting proposition, says Dr. Shamban. She is extra optimistic about PRF’s potential, however agrees with Dr. Day that it’s not an alternative choice to hyaluronic acid filler, as a result of it doesn’t have the identical energy or volumizing skills, and it breaks down quicker. Nevertheless, she sees a world during which it’s doable PRF may very well be mixed with filler. It may very well be a useful device for particular sufferers—“as suppliers, we’ve got an enormous array of merchandise, however it’s about 25% the merchandise chosen and 75% strategies and injection type that make a distinction,” says Dr. Shamban.

What does the FDA need to say about utilizing a affected person’s blood to probably regenerate their pores and skin? In response to Dr. Shamban, the FDA views PRP and PRF equally to a tissue switch. “They’re anxious about contamination, like if [the blood] is badly processed,” she explains, including that the recognition of PRF and PRP therapies at medspas versus board-certified dermatologists means there might probably be a mix-up of affected person samples. For reference, a New Mexico spa got here underneath fireplace after three individuals have been contaminated with HIV after receiving PRP facials. The FDA has issued a warning letter in opposition to regenerative drugs merchandise that embody stem cells. Within the letter, the FDA cautions, “There may be numerous deceptive data on the web about these merchandise, together with statements in regards to the circumstances they can be utilized to deal with. FDA is worried that many sufferers searching for cures and cures could also be misled by details about merchandise which are illegally marketed, haven’t been proven to be protected or efficient, and, in some circumstances, could have important questions of safety that put sufferers in danger.” We reached out to the FDA to ask if PRF injections can be included on this warning, and at press time, had not obtained affirmation.

To learn extra injectable information: